top of page

EMA News

Home > News > Post

What is the limit of Erasmus Mundus programmes you can apply for annually? Hint: it's not 3.

Writer: EMA Admin
EMA Admin
Jan 20, 2022
3 min read

Updated: Jan 21, 2022

By the Erasmus Mundus Association Editorial Team


EMA has received a lot of questions recently from prospective students who want to know how many EMJM(D)s they can apply for this year. Is there a maximum? Has the rule changed?


It is officially confirmed that there is no official limit for the amount of programmes that applicants can apply for.


Previously, under the former EMJMD action, students could only apply for an EMJMD scholarship to a maximum of three different joint programmes per academic year. The Erasmus+ Programme Guide for the EMJMD project generations until 2019 stated: “Student candidates can apply for an EMJMD scholarship to any of the Erasmus+ Erasmus Mundus courses of their choice, but are limited to a maximum of three different joint programmes per academic year.”


EMA spoke to Dagmar Höpcke, Project Advisor working in Unit A3 at the EACEA, the team in charge of implementing the Erasmus Mundus programmes. She told us that there were legal complications related to monitoring the number of applications per person which resulted in this rule being cancelled.


According to Höpcke, due to legal issues this rule was abandoned as of the EMJMD project generation 2019.


Rajon Bhuiyan, previous scholarship recipient and graduate of the Erasmus Mundus programme Masters in Management and Engineering of Environment and Energy (ME3) and Director of Outreach and Capacity Building at EMA, said that “lifting the cap on the number of EMJM(D) applications that an applicant can submit in one academic intake is a welcome new change. Many applicants may have previously had up to four or five relevant programmes in their shortlist but would have to cross out highly relevant programmes even though it matches with their background and aligns with their future goals.


“I personally wanted to apply to four energy-related EMJMDs during my application time period, but I had to cross out one of them due to the previous restriction,” he said.



Not everyone is enthusiastic about this change, though. EMA also spoke to Dr. Lydia Potts, Consortium Coordinator for the European Master in Migration and Intercultural Relations (EMMIR). Potts told EMA that “although this rule has been cancelled, I would kindly ask all applicants to refrain from applying for more than three programmes. Each application requires special attention, we take great care of the evaluation. We are happy if our application database does not become overwhelmed by applicants.”


Additionally, Potts said that if potential students applying for EMJMs are accepted to multiple programmes and choose another one to study with, this would result in EMJMs having to rely more heavily on reserve lists of waitlisted applicants, which would result in a delay for EMJMs to finalise their incoming student lists.


“We would prefer to limit applications to those actually wanting to do this specific programme,” she said.


However, Höpcke has stated that these issues have not been reported as being a major concern for EMJM(D) consortia so far. She has also insisted on the fact that EMJM programmes are based on specific requirements and appeal to specialised applicant profiles.


Even in the absence of a formal restriction in the number of applications a student might submit, the EACEA has told EMA that it is highly recommended to potential applicants to choose carefully the master courses on the basis of the preconditions/selection criteria described on the websites of the respective EMJM(D)s.


As a rule, EMA President Gabriella Mikiewicz agrees that applicants should only apply to programmes that they are seriously interested in studying in: “I highly recommend that prospective students are very intentional about the programmes they apply to and only apply if they are very motivated to study with that programme. Additionally, just because there is no official limit from the European Commission on the number of applications you can submit, I still encourage you to check the website of the programmes you’re interested in to see what they recommend.


“EMJM(D)s want to see that you’re actually very motivated to study their programme, especially if you have a slightly different background or education than the programme you’re applying for.”

Recent Posts

See All

92 Comments


Noname Noname
Noname Noname
6 days ago

This piece about these little friends made me smile with its down-to-earth observations. The author didn't need to say much; just a few small details were enough to bring the scene to life. I was reading it on the sofa one afternoon—having idly opened a card game app to stave off boredom and recalling a mention of PH222 but I found myself lingering on the description of the animal. The article didn't require a grand conclusion; it simply allowed the reader to find a sense of familiarity in seemingly ordinary moments.

Like

Bobine Burch
Oct 12

Việc biết đến vipjl com hoàn toàn là tình cờ khi mình đang đọc một bài viết về quản lý tài liệu và rà soát phần nguồn tham khảo ở cuối trang. Thấy tên miền này xuất hiện nên mình mở thử cho biết chủ yếu xem cách họ sắp xếp danh mục. Mình lướt qua vài trang thì thấy hệ thống duy trì bố cục hợp lý làm cho tin tức thể thao và bàn chơi live casino không bị đan xen lộn xộn. Các hạng mục trò chơi slot được chia thẳng vào từng sảnh game tạo nên một không gian nhìn khá sạch sẽ.

Like

goudan fu
goudan fu
Oct 12

Refraining from more than three applications, as Lydia Potts suggests, puts the burden in the wrong place. The cap was dropped from the EMJMD project generation 2019 for legal reasons, not because consortia proved unable to handle volume; applicants already self-filter through prerequisites. Comparing programmes isn’t like checking what Pokémon cards are worth; fit and motivation matter more than an arbitrary number. Reserve lists are normal admissions mechanics, not grounds to shrink a shortlist.

Like

Bobine Burch
Oct 10

I had not really noticed PH222 until I happened to see its name mentioned. I decided to open the website and take a quick look, mainly focusing on the layout rather than the functions. The different types of content are placed into separate sections, and the headings are clear enough to show where I am on the page. The mobile display is also fairly tidy and readable. Overall, I think the interface feels quite direct and easy to follow.

Like

Noname Noname
Noname Noname
Oct 09

Vì chủ yếu chơi trên điện thoại nên mình khá chú ý đến trải nghiệm mobile. Khi thử chuyển từ slot sang thể thao rồi qua game bài, mình thấy tốc độ tải khá nhanh. Nội dung được phân chia rõ nên việc điều hướng cũng nhẹ nhàng. Lúc mình vào EEJL chỉ xem nhanh để nắm bố cục tổng thể và cách trình bày, chưa tìm hiểu kỹ, nhưng ấn tượng ban đầu là trang sắp xếp gọn gàng. Theo mình, cách tổ chức này giúp mang lại trải nghiệm khá liền mạch.

Like
bottom of page